
Year-End Functions: Keeping the Party Legal
South African employers love a good year-end bash—but the courts have made it clear that the festive cheer ends the moment conduct threatens the employment relationship. Below is a refreshed article that replaces the fictional authorities with reported decisions and folds in the legal pointers you asked for.
1 Why “after hours” can still be “at work”
The Labour Courts (and even the Constitutional Court) apply a “work-nexus” test: if conduct outside ordinary hours damages the employer’s reputation, disrupts trust or poisons workplace relations, discipline is permissible.
-
SARS v CCMA & Kruger – the Constitutional Court confirmed that racist speech uttered away from the office justified dismissal because it destroyed the trust relationship. sars.gov.za
-
Edcon Ltd v Cantamessa – a senior buyer’s racist Facebook rant posted while on leave was held dismissible; the employer’s reputation was at stake. saflii.org
-
Trinity Telecoms (Pty) Ltd v CCMA – allegations of dishonesty made at the 2019 year-end function led to dismissal proceedings; the Court accepted that a function organised (and paid for) by the employer remains part of the employment context. saflii.org
Key point: the event venue and the clock are irrelevant once there is a clear link to the employer’s interests.
2 Real-world misconduct scenarios (and the cases behind them)
Misconduct | Reported authority | What the Court held |
---|---|---|
Sexual harassment at an employer-sponsored gathering | Campbell Scientific Africa (Pty) Ltd v Simmers & Others – unwanted “come to my room” advances on a colleague while on a business trip amounted to sexual harassment; dismissal upheld. saflii.org | Harassment is “the most heinous workplace misconduct”; dismissal was fair. |
Racist or hateful remarks posted during or after the function | Makhoba v CCMA & Clover SA – employee’s Facebook post “Whites must be killed” justified dismissal. saflii.org Edcon v Cantamessa – racist “monkeys” post placed company reputation at risk. saflii.org |
Off-duty social-media racism can be disciplined where it harms the employer. |
Verbal or physical aggression fuelled by alcohol | Crown Chickens t/a Rocklands Poultry v Kapp – use of the K-word toward a co-worker was “anathema to sound industrial relations”; dismissal inevitable. studocu.com | Violence or hate speech at any work-related event usually warrants dismissal. |
3 Statutory anchors you must know
-
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 – Schedule 8 (Code of Good Practice on Misconduct) sets the fairness standards for any disciplinary action.
-
Employment Equity Act s 60 – an employer may be vicariously liable for harassment at a work event if it cannot show that “reasonable steps” were taken to prevent it.
-
Code of Good Practice on the Prevention and Elimination of Harassment (GG 46056, 18 Mar 2022) – requires proactive policies, training and prompt investigation. labour.gov.za
4 Pre-event risk-management checklist
-
Circulate a “Year-End Function Policy”. Make it clear the function is an extension of the workplace and that normal rules on harassment, discrimination, substance abuse and confidentiality apply.
-
Control alcohol. Voucher or “two-drink” systems and a defined “last call” help manage intoxication risks.
-
Nominate sober duty-managers. At least two senior staff should stay alert, intervene early and record incidents.
-
Arrange safe transport. Taxis, shuttles or designated drivers reduce drunk-driving liabilities.
-
Brief the venue. Ensure hotel or restaurant security understand whom to contact if trouble flares.
5 Handling an incident the right way
Step | Practical action |
---|---|
Investigate immediately | Secure CCTV / cellphone footage, social-media posts and witness statements. |
Follow Schedule 8 | Give the employee clear charges, reasonable time to prepare and a fair hearing. |
Assess sanction | Consider the seriousness, prior record, impact on co-workers and consistency with past cases. |
Document everything | A proper paper trail is essential if the matter lands at the CCMA or Labour Court. |
Failure to follow fair procedure was precisely why Trinity Telecoms lost its review—despite the misconduct occurring at a year-end party. saflii.org
6 Bottom-line lessons for employers
-
“It happened after hours” is not a defence if the conduct taints the workplace.
-
Courts treat harassment, racism and violence at functions as seriously as if they happened in the office.
-
A written policy plus visible supervision and fair, prompt discipline are the best shields against litigation.
7 Need help?
Laboured South Africa can:
-
Draft or update your Year-End Function Policy.
-
Train managers on spotting and stopping misconduct.
-
Conduct or chair fair disciplinary hearings.
-
Defend you at the CCMA or Labour Court.
Contact: info@laboured.org.za | 082 330 3939 | www.laboured.org.za
- CCMA
- Christmas party workplace discipline
- Company party misconduct South Africa
- Disciplinary action year-end function misconduct
- Discipline in the workplace
- employee
- Employee misconduct year-end function
- Employees
- How to handle employee misconduct at company party
- Labour law year-end functions
- LRA
- Office party misconduct cases
- South African labour law events
- Workplace party discipline